TheBattlefieldfranchise is one with a huge breadth of narrative storytelling, with a slew of series installments taking place across a huge array of time periods and geographical settings. As well as offering riveting first-person shooter multiplayer, the franchise was additionally always known for its ambitious campaign experiences.

However, more recent installments to theBattlefieldfranchise have possessed much more compartmentalized approached to single-player content, much to the detriment of memorability and fan attachment to any involved characters. For any future installments,Battlefieldcampaigns should look toward their most successful predecessors, namely the campaigns of the fan-favoriteBad Companygames, and the likable characters within them.

battlefield 5 war stories last tiger

RELATED:Battlefield 1’s Resurgence Shows That More WW1-Themed Battlefield Games Could Be Worthwhile

Recent Campaigns Within Battlefield

As opposed to traditional long-form campaigns that follow a consistent and developing narrative,Battlefieldcampaigns have recently taken a completely different route. For example, the recenttitles ofBattlefield 1andBattlefield 5, which are set in World War 1 and World War 2 respectively, had single-player modes that took the form of “War Stories.” These are a series of individual missions that tell different tales about the many different fronts on which these wars were fought, and while doing lots in the way of representing a more comprehensive view of these conflicts, these War Stories do not allow for much character development.

With the characters of each mission changing completely between each story, this newBattlefieldcampaign formula is much more focused on storytelling through setting as opposed to character interaction and progression. To make matters worse, the franchise recently deviated from its older narrative norms even further by not including any form of single-player in themassive release ofBattlefield 2042. Given the negative publicity surrounding this latest title, it is clear thatBattlefieldis not having much success with its new approach to single-player experiences, and thus must look back to the games that put the franchise on the map.

Article image

While only being comprised of two games in total,theBattlefield: Bad Companyseriesis one of the most iconic staples of the entire franchise, being fondly remembered by many long-term fans. Not only did the twoBad Companygames have comprehensive and well-balanced multiplayer modes, but both games crucially included compelling and character-driven campaigns, which appeared to take precedence over the other modes that the titles boasted.

Telling the story of a small but highly-efficient squad of battle hardened soldiers,theBad Companycampaignshad the benefit of utilizing the same characters across both titles, allowing for a much-needed sense of narrative consistency to be established. The soldiers who made up this squad were unique from one another, yet had formed an undeniable bond through combat that shone through into core gameplay and beyond.

With only four soldiers making up the titular Bad Company, one being the protagonist, the player is intimately involved with the interactions between these characters in the series of high-stakes situations that they find themselves in, upping the ante and involvement that a player feels in the core narrative of the two games. The newerBattlefieldtitles' lack of extended narrative and the resultant lack of depth that it affords the characters is clearly working to the detriment of the reception to the recent campaigns, and is something that seemingly needs to be remedied in future releases. Considering the consistentlyvocal community that exists around theBad Companygamesand their narratively consistent campaigns, it is clear that futureBattlefieldinstallments should take inspiration from the character dynamics within them.

MORE:Battlefield 2042 Coming to Xbox Game Pass Ultimate, EA Access in Season 3